1.0
Define the safe lane
Project owners can choose limited cases where review can relax, such as low-risk informational replies.
- Allowed intents
- Confidence threshold
- Known knowledge source
Home
Solution
Low-risk automation
Relax review only where project policy explicitly allows it, confidence is high, and the side effect stays low risk.
Opt-in
Explicit
Automation is never implied.
Risk
Low
High-risk intents remain review-bound.
Checks
Server
Policy gates enforce the boundary.
2.0
Do not bypass accountability
Even low-risk automation still needs policy checks, idempotency, and audit logging before execution.
- Policy result
- Idempotency
- Audit event
Operations
What this means in production.
These pages describe the product contract behind the UI, not a decorative brochure. Each surface should connect back to the same governed support loop.
Control boundary
High-risk topics remain gated.
Operator workflow
Support moves through secure ingest, AI preparation, human approval, outbound execution, and audit evidence.
Configuration impact
Provider setup, project policies, knowledge trust, retention, and billing limits decide how this behaves for a real workspace.
Proof points
Designed for governed support, not hidden autonomy.
High-risk topics remain gated.
Real sends require approval.
Runtime checks enforce limits.
References
Official stack and legal references.
These external links point to provider documentation, privacy notices, data-processing terms, or platform terms that shape production operation.
Next